I'm sure that it can be configured to all run out of the buildtools, but I'm not an expert on the reporting config site.
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Sean Owen <[email protected]> wrote: > Any or all sounds good, I'm mostly wondering whether there's a way > around having two sets of these files. > > I love static analysis and style-checking. Warning automatically on > violations is cool. Blocking commits sounds nice but in practice, > these things turn up a few false positives that cause problems. So, > y'know, I could live with just reports, so the interested can work on > fixing up code when motivated. > > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Buildtools exists to support a classpath-based scheme for managing these > > configs. It has some advantages as written up in the CXF-derived > description > > that I originally circulated, partially related to using the same configs > in > > maven and inside eclipse. If we are heading for 'checkstyle is a report, > not > > something we enforce,' then perhaps the eclipse configs are not that > > important, and ..-ing our way to these from an etc dir is fine. This > might > > in turn allow removing buildtools altogether. What do people want out of > > this? Do they want to preserve the enforcement option? > > > > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Robin Anil <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> I am also not sure about the build tools. But to answer the other > >> question about the config xml files. Check the pom.xml in trunk. In > >> the reporting section you will find the paths to all the xmls. They > >> are the ones used to generate the reports and thus on hudson > >> > >> Robin > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Sean Owen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > The ones under buildtools/ are just identical to the ones under maven/ > >> > though, what do you mean? (They're a subset of the files, actually.) > >> > > >> > Actually what is buildtools/ used for now, I'm not seeing what it does > >> anymore. > >> > > >> > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Robin Anil <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> >> I havent pointed all of them at maven. See the reporting section of > the > >> pom file > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >
