Much better answer. I don't think it is abuse at all ... generics are there to save explicit casts.
Keeping the final in place is also good. On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Sean Owen <[email protected]> wrote: > You could save this cast with a generic type on > VectorWritable too. While it might be abusing the meaning of generics > a little, it would serve a practical purpose. No subclasses needed. >
