Ok.
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > Or just flat in o.a.m.vectorizer. There aren't a lot of classes we are > talking about. > > On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Robin Anil <[email protected]> wrote: > > > i.e > > o.a.m.vectorizer.dictionary > > o.a.m.vectorizer.hashencoder > > > > > > On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Same question applies to the FeatureValueEncoder family currently under > > > classifier.vectors.* > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Robin Anil <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > How do you feel like moving the DictionaryVectorizer and Colloc > > generator > > > > to > > > > the Core under vectorizers package instead of keeping them under > utils. > > > > FeatureEncoders will also be moved under vectorizers. I want to add a > > > > Wrapper which takes a Vectorizer and converts input data to vectors. > > Its > > > > the > > > > missing piece of the Classifier puzzle > > > > > > > > o.a.m.vectorizer.dictionary > > > > o.a.m.vectorizer.hashed or something funkier? > > > > > > > > What do you think about this? > > > > > > > > Robin > > > > > > > > > >
