I checked the patch. It has nothing to do with utils/ folder and the files I
moved to core. So MAHOUT-521 is in the clear

On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 4:21 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote:

> Robin, (and everybody)
>
> Watch out for pending wide-scale changes from MAHOUT-480.
>
> Anybody who would like to avoid those changes hanging fire can do a quick
> (right) review of the pending patch.  Only 93
> files are changed so it should be a breeze!
>
> Eugen did a ton of work to get all those changes done in the first place.
>  I
> found a few discrepancies and would
> like somebody to check my checking.  I will commit the changes as soon as I
> am sure we got these right.
>
> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Robin Anil <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I just uploaded a patch for moving DictionaryVectorizer. Take a look
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Robin Anil <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Ok.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> Or just flat in o.a.m.vectorizer.  There aren't a lot of classes we
> are
> > >> talking about.
> > >>
> > >> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Robin Anil <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > i.e
> > >> > o.a.m.vectorizer.dictionary
> > >> > o.a.m.vectorizer.hashencoder
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 12:49 AM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]
> >
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Same question applies to the FeatureValueEncoder family currently
> > >> under
> > >> > > classifier.vectors.*
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Robin Anil <[email protected]
> >
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > How do you feel like moving the DictionaryVectorizer and Colloc
> > >> > generator
> > >> > > > to
> > >> > > > the Core under vectorizers package instead of keeping them under
> > >> utils.
> > >> > > > FeatureEncoders will also be moved under vectorizers. I want to
> > add
> > >> a
> > >> > > > Wrapper which takes a Vectorizer and converts input data to
> > vectors.
> > >> > Its
> > >> > > > the
> > >> > > > missing piece of the Classifier puzzle
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > o.a.m.vectorizer.dictionary
> > >> > > > o.a.m.vectorizer.hashed or something funkier?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > What do you think about this?
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Robin
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to