Can we agree on some sort of way to annotate classes that might be deleted?
I would suggest: // TODO remove before 0.5 I am happy to add a bunch of these and summarize all of the annotations that I or anybody else makes. Sound good? I agree that now is a great time to drop a lot of unused code and I would be happy to cut deep rather than be cautious. On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Sean Owen <[email protected]> wrote: > @dev now is probably a good time to talk about whether more of the > deprecated, unused math code can be deleted. If nobody's touched it, > nobody's bothered to test it, nobody's using it (and recall it is not to be > used by external users as it is deprecated) -- would you want someone to > bother writing tests? I feel like this code is just going to be there in > the > same state in another 12 months. It's not right to leave deprecated code > indefinitely. What should we do then? >
