Cool. I thought it was pretty slick how the pre-existing parts all fit together. Perhaps even elegant.
-----Original Message----- From: Ted Dunning [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 8:50 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: List your changes for Mahout 0.5 I would say that we mention it. On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Jeff Eastman <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't know. It does a credible (but still sequential) job of clustering > kmeans, fuzzyk and dirichlet. It is clearly still experimental. You guys be > the judge... > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ted Dunning [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 8:39 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: List your changes for Mahout 0.5 > > Is it done enough to claim? > > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Jeff Eastman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Perhaps premature, but would you want to include the > > clustering-classification convergence e.g. ClusterClassifier? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Sean Owen [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 7:51 AM > > To: Mahout Dev List > > Subject: List your changes for Mahout 0.5 > > > > • Improved Lanczos solver > > • Stochastic Singular Value Decomposition implementation > > • Incremental SVD implementation > > • Alternating Least Squares with Weighted Regularization > > collaborative filtering implementation, both distributed and > > non-distributed > > • SVDRecommender enhancements > > • Better control over candidate item selection in item-based > > recommenders > > • Significant removal of deprecated or dead code > > • Many bug fixes, refactorings and other small improvements > > > > What else? > > >
