Could someone who understands it create a diagram of how the parts fit together?
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 8:57 AM, Jeff Eastman <[email protected]> wrote: > Cool. I thought it was pretty slick how the pre-existing parts all fit > together. Perhaps even elegant. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ted Dunning [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 8:50 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: List your changes for Mahout 0.5 > > I would say that we mention it. > > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Jeff Eastman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I don't know. It does a credible (but still sequential) job of clustering >> kmeans, fuzzyk and dirichlet. It is clearly still experimental. You guys be >> the judge... >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ted Dunning [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 8:39 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: List your changes for Mahout 0.5 >> >> Is it done enough to claim? >> >> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Jeff Eastman <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Perhaps premature, but would you want to include the >> > clustering-classification convergence e.g. ClusterClassifier? >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Sean Owen [mailto:[email protected]] >> > Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 7:51 AM >> > To: Mahout Dev List >> > Subject: List your changes for Mahout 0.5 >> > >> > • Improved Lanczos solver >> > • Stochastic Singular Value Decomposition implementation >> > • Incremental SVD implementation >> > • Alternating Least Squares with Weighted Regularization >> > collaborative filtering implementation, both distributed and >> > non-distributed >> > • SVDRecommender enhancements >> > • Better control over candidate item selection in item-based >> > recommenders >> > • Significant removal of deprecated or dead code >> > • Many bug fixes, refactorings and other small improvements >> > >> > What else? >> > >> > -- Lance Norskog [email protected]
