My suggestion is that it never store any data (more than a tiny cache at most) and should compute the random value as murmurHash(i+":"+j+salt). Instead of string concatenation, of course, you should use successive updates to the hash.
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Lance Norskog <goks...@gmail.com> wrote: > But still, how should a random based on MurmurHash work? >
