I've installed the take 3 .gz bits and they built without issue. I've run the synthetic control examples on both my clusters and they also ran without issue. The clustering display examples run in local mode and SpectralK still has the same file path problem I reported earlier. The 20 newsgroups example runs on MapR but still gets the version mismatch error on my CDH3 cluster. So no changes since take 2 but these don't seem like showstoppers to me.
+1 for take 3 -----Original Message----- From: Dmitriy Lyubimov [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 11:50 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3 For what it's worth i can add +1 but on the same basis i did it before take 3. I won't be able to verify any of these new problems any time soon. On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Jeff Eastman <[email protected]> wrote: > Will try to get you one today :) > > -----Original Message----- > From: Benson Margulies [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 10:59 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3 > > Legally, we need 3 +1's on this thread on this RC. > > > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Jeff Eastman <[email protected]> wrote: >> I did some cluster testing of take 2 and only found one potential issue >> surfaced by an example that is broken. Haven't waded through the 100+ >> postings since I got back last night, but it looked good to me then. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ted Dunning [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 10:04 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Mahout 0.5, take 3 >> >> I am rushing around clearing the decks for my trip to Europe, but I very >> much hope to take a gander today. >> >> Over the weekend, I did use the trunk distribution with good results. I >> didn't get the map-reduce stuff going since I was focussed on SGD work. >> There is a possible niggling issue with SGD, but should not hold up the >> release. >> >> +1 >> >> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Sean Owen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Thanks Grant -- any other thoughts? I'm generally assuming those +1s carry >>> over, but would be ideal to hear the votes explicitly from the PMC. *Do* >>> have a look through the artifacts! If nothing turns up, would be great to >>> finish this up tonight! I have a backlog of commits ready. >>> >>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected] >>> >wrote: >>> >>> > Looking now. >>> >> >
