Hey,

Cool, I was already working on this but I will check your patch first. If
it's working I will just commit it. Thanks for your contribution to Mahout

On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 11:09 AM, Ikumasa Mukai (Updated) (JIRA) <
[email protected]> wrote:

>
>     [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-840?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel]
>
> Ikumasa Mukai updated MAHOUT-840:
> ---------------------------------
>
>    Attachment: regression.patch
>
> Hello,
> This is my first comment on jira.
>
> Now I am trying to implement a TreeBuilder which can also be used for
> Regression problems with MAHOUT-840 modifications.
>
> For this, I think some additional modifications are needed (patch
> attached).
> Could you please check this patch?
>
> This patch contains these points.
> 1) Changed target and prediction params from int to double.
> 2) Added the prediction for regression problem (using majority rule if
> target param is numeric)
> 3) Added changes for using numeric target param.
> 4) Added changes for detecting the target param type.
> 5) Added a func on Dataset for getting the number of category type params.
>
> cheers
>
> > Decision Forests should support Regression problems
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> >
> >                 Key: MAHOUT-840
> >                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-840
> >             Project: Mahout
> >          Issue Type: New Feature
> >          Components: Classification
> >            Reporter: Deneche A. Hakim
> >            Assignee: Deneche A. Hakim
> >         Attachments: regression.patch
> >
> >
> > Improve Decision Forest code in order to handle numerical targets, thus
> supporting regression problems
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
> administrators:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>
>
>

Reply via email to