Thanks, Patrick. it says it will accept any unified diff format. Does it mean it will accept a standard 'diff' output?
in theory, I can try to tune my local git to produce diffs with a standard diff routine if it works. I am not sure what it has to do with repository type. Other folks in our project seemed to have been able to upload a diff, not sure if they used git diff or something else. Thank you. On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dmitriy my experience, at least on ZooKeeper, is that we needed > both a zookeeper and a zookeeper-git repository in order to support > svn & git (respectively) in RB. Try pinging Infra, they can add this > for you. > > Regards, > > Patrick > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]> wrote: >> the error i am getting is >> >> No valid separator after the filename was found in the diff header >> >> so it looks like it needs specific tweaks for a patch. However 'patch' >> routine would apply my output cleanly. So i am at loss. >> >> -d >> >> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]> wrote: >>> ok it wouldn't eat up my git diff output no matter what i do. >>> >>> i tried git diff, git diff -p , git diff -p --no-prefix, git diff -u >>> --no-prefix for base directories both / and /trunk, all of these >>> combinations, to no avail. it looks like it doesn't like git diff >>> output. >>> >>> Any ideas are welcome.
