+1 math should get anything not data-structurey which doesn't depend on Hadoop.
On Tuesday, January 1, 2013, Ted Dunning wrote: > I would rather see Pair moved to math. > > On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Dan Filimon > <[email protected]<javascript:;> > >wrote: > > > I fixed it by moving the classes I wanted into core rather than math. > > I moved WeightedVector and Centroid to core. > > > > I'm playing around with a patch for that vector refactoring peeve [1]. > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1135 > > > > On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Sean Owen <[email protected]<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > core depends on math. I suppose the idea way back when was that math > > > was core-core and should and could be separable. > > > You just need to depend on core (too). > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Dan Filimon < > [email protected] <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > >> Specifically, I'm playing around with implementing a pet peeve [1]. > > >> I can't access org.apache.mahout.common.Pair in mahout-math. What's > > >> the simplest way of doing that? > > >> > > >> Thanks! > > >> > > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1135 > > > -- -jake
