Jake's comment is to the point. The real difference between math and core is that core depends on hadoop and math does not. That makes math much more widely useful.
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 7:03 PM, Jake Mannix <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > math should get anything not data-structurey which doesn't depend on > Hadoop. > > On Tuesday, January 1, 2013, Ted Dunning wrote: > > > I would rather see Pair moved to math. > > > > On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Dan Filimon <[email protected] > <javascript:;> > > >wrote: > > > > > I fixed it by moving the classes I wanted into core rather than math. > > > I moved WeightedVector and Centroid to core. > > > > > > I'm playing around with a patch for that vector refactoring peeve [1]. > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1135 > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Sean Owen <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > > core depends on math. I suppose the idea way back when was that math > > > > was core-core and should and could be separable. > > > > You just need to depend on core (too). > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Dan Filimon < > > [email protected] <javascript:;>> > > > wrote: > > > >> Specifically, I'm playing around with implementing a pet peeve [1]. > > > >> I can't access org.apache.mahout.common.Pair in mahout-math. What's > > > >> the simplest way of doing that? > > > >> > > > >> Thanks! > > > >> > > > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1135 > > > > > > > > -- > > -jake >
