Yep, I was planning on using Lucene's FST.
________________________________ From: Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> To: [email protected]; Suneel Marthi <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2013 8:41 AM Subject: Re: 0.9? On Sep 27, 2013, at 9:07 AM, Suneel Marthi <[email protected]> wrote: I was gonna bring this up myself next week (and was chatting with Isabel about it today morning). > >I was thinking of the following for 0.9:- > >1. We have already removed the algorithms that have been marked as deprecated >in 0.8 >2. Bugs that have been fixed since 0.8. >3. New Features in 0.9 could include :- > a) New Multilayer Perceptron that Yexi had contributed recently and is >presently pending review (don't know the JIRA# top of my head). > b) Using Finite State Transducers as a dictionary type. I had opened a >Jira for this and an work on it. > > Are you using Lucene's FSTs for this? Rest sounds good. Anything else others would like to add??? > >Grant, could we have a hangout the week of Oct 7 :) ?? > I can't that week, but probably the following. > > > >________________________________ >From: Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> >To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >Sent: Friday, September 27, 2013 8:48 AM >Subject: 0.9? > > >Anyone interested in thinking about 0.9 in the early Nov. time frame? > >-Grant -------------------------------------------- Grant Ingersoll | @gsingers http://www.lucidworks.com
