Hi Ted, This sounds good to the extent we can get them done. Do you have JIRA issues for any of these open? November isn't hard and fast for 0.9, but I suspect it will be January if we push things out.
-Grant On Sep 28, 2013, at 1:59 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: > The one large-ish feature that I think would find general use would be a high > performance classifier trainer. > > Flor cleanup sort of thing it would be good to fully integrate the streaming > k-means into the normal clustering commands while revamping the command line > API. > > Dmitriy's recent scala work would help quite a bit before 1.0. Not sure it > can make 0.9. > > For recommendations, I think that the demo system that pat started with the > elaborations by Ellen an Tim would be very good to have. > > I would be happy to collaborate with somebody on these but am not at all > likely to have time to actually do them end to end. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Sep 28, 2013, at 12:40, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Moving closer to 1.0, removing cruft, etc. Do we have any more major >> features planned for 1.0? I think we said during 0.8 that we would try to >> follow pretty quickly w/ another release. >> >> -Grant >> >> On Sep 28, 2013, at 12:33 PM, Ted Dunning <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Sounds right in principle but perhaps a bit soon. >>> >>> What would define the release? >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>> On Sep 27, 2013, at 7:48, Grant Ingersoll <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Anyone interested in thinking about 0.9 in the early Nov. time frame? >>>> >>>> -Grant >> >> -------------------------------------------- >> Grant Ingersoll | @gsingers >> http://www.lucidworks.com >> >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------------- Grant Ingersoll | @gsingers http://www.lucidworks.com
