Possibly. I'll know more after Monday (got a few big deadlines then). 

iPhone'd

> On Nov 28, 2013, at 13:32, Suneel Marthi <suneel_mar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> Shannon,
> 
> Would it be possible to add Spectral clustering to 
> examples/bin/cluster-reuters.sh (for 0.9)?
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thursday, November 28, 2013 12:59 PM, Shannon Quinn <squ...@gatech.edu> 
> wrote:
> 
> I'll aim to get the documentation on spectral clustering done by 0.9, and the 
> code fixes and improvements in for 1.0.
> 
> iPhone'd
> 
> 
>> On Nov 28, 2013, at 12:15, Suneel Marthi <suneel_mar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Yes, lets defer the arbitrary properties to next release.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Thursday, November 28, 2013 11:02 AM, Andrew Musselman 
>> <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Was going to open M-1030 this weekend; I think doing the quick fix can be 
>> done in time and the more involved job of putting arbitrary properties on 
>> vectors should be pushed to 1.0.
>> 
>> Sound reasonable?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Suneel Marthi <suneel_mar...@yahoo.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Forgot to add 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> M-1288 Solr Recommender - Pat Ferrell
>>> 
>>> to my earlier email.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thursday, November 28, 2013 10:38 AM, Suneel Marthi 
>>> <suneel_mar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Adding Mahout-1349 to the list of JIRAs .
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thursday, November 28, 2013 10:37 AM, Suneel Marthi 
>>> <suneel_mar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Update on Open JIRAs for 0.9:
>>> 
>>> Mahout-1245, Mahout-1304, Mahout-1305, Mahout-1307, Mahout-1326 - all 
>>> related to Wiki updates, please see Isabel's updates.
>>> 
>>> M-1286 - Peng and
>>>   Sebastian, we had talked about this during the last hangout. Can this be 
>>> included in 0.9?
>>> 
>>> M-1030- Andrew Musselman, its critical that we get this into 0.9, its been 
>>> deferred for last 2 Mahout releases.
>>> 
>>> M-1319, M-1328, M-1347, M-1350 - Suneel
>>> 
>>> 
>>> M-1265 - Multi Layer Perceptron, Yexi please look at my comments on 
>>> Reviewboard.
>>> 
>>> M-1273 - Kun Yung, Ted, defer this to next release ???
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> M-1312, M-1256 - Stevo, could u take one of them
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Thursday, November 28, 2013 5:01 AM, Isabel Drost-Fromm 
>>> <isa...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:23:11 -0800
>>>   (PST)
>>> Suneel Marthi <suneel_mar...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> Below are the Open issues for 0.9:-
>>> 
>>> This looks like we should be targeting Dec. 9th as code freeze to me.
>>> What do you all think?
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Mahout-1245, Mahout-1304, Mahout-1305, Mahout-1307, Mahout-1326 - All
>>>> related to Wiki updates, missing Wiki documentation and Wiki
>>>> migration to new CMS.  Isabel's working on M-1245 (migrating to new
>>>> CMS). Could some of the others be consolidated with that?
>>> 
>>> I believe MAHOUT-1245 essentially is ready to be published - all I want
>>> before notifying INFRA to
>>> switch to the new cms based site is one other
>>> person to take at least a brief look.
>>> 
>>> For MAHOUT-1304 - Sebastian, can you please check that the cms based
>>> site actually does fit on 1280px? We can close this issue then.
>>> 
>>> MAHOUT-1305 - I think this should be turned into a task to actually
>>> delete most of the pages that have been migrated to the new CMS (almost
>>> all of them). Once 1245 is shipped, it would be great if a few more
>>> people could lend a hand in getting this done.
>>> 
>>> MAHOUT-1307 - Can be closed once switched to CMS
>>> 
>>> MAHOUT-1326 - This really relates to the old Confluence export plugin
>>> we once have been using to generate static pages out of our wiki that
>>> is no longer active. Unless anyone on the Mahout dev list
>>> knows how to
>>> fully
>>>   delete all exported static pages we should file an issue with
>>> INFRA to ask for help getting those deleted. They definitely are
>>> confusing to users.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> M-1286 - Peng and ssc, we had talked about this during the last
>>>> hangout. Can this be included in 0.9?
>>>> 
>>>> M-1030 - Andrew Musselman? Any updates on this, its important that we
>>>> fix this for 0.9
>>>> 
>>>> M-1319, M-1328,
>>>>    M-1347, M-1364 - Suneel
>>>> 
>>>> M-1273 - Kun Yung, remember talking about this in one of the earlier
>>>> hangouts; can't recall what was decided?
>>>> 
>>>> M-1312, M-1256 - Dan Filimon (or Stevo??)
>>>> 
>>>> M-996  someone could pick
>>>   this up (if its still relevant with present
>>>> codebase i.e.)
>>> 
>>> I think this can move to the next release - according to the
>>> contributor and Sebastian the patch is rather hacky and there for
>>> illustration purposes only. I'd rather see some more thought go into
>>> that instead of pushing to have this in 0.9.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> M-1265 Yexi had submitted a patch for this, it would be good if this
>>>> could go in as part of 0.9 
>>>> 
>>>> M-1288 Solr Recommender - Pat Ferrell
>>>> 
>>>> M-1285: Any takers for this?
>>> 
>>> Would be nice to have - in particular if someone on dev@ (not
>>> necessarily a committer) wants to get started with the code base.
>>> Otherwise I'd say fix for next release
>>>   if time gets short.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> M-1356: Isabel's started on this, Stevo could u review this?
>>> 
>>> We definitely can punt that for the next release or even thereafter. It
>>> would be great if someone who has some knowledge of Java security
>>> policies would take a look. The implication of not fixing this
>>> essentially is that in case someone commits test code that writes
>>> outside of target or to some globally shared directory we might end up
>>> having randomly failing tests due to the parallel setup again. But as
>>> these will occur shortly after the commit it should be easy enough to
>>> find the code change that caused the breakage.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> M-1329: Support for Hadoop 2
>>> 
>>> Is that truly feasable
>>>   within a week?
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> M-1366:  Stevo, Isabel ????
>>> 
>>> This should be done as part of the release process by release manager
>>> at the latest.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> M-1261: Sebastian???
>>>> 
>>>> M-1309, M-1310, M-1311, M-1316 - all related to running Mahout on
>>>> Windows ??
>>> 
>>> I'm not aware of us supporting Windows.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> M-1350 - Any takers?? (Stevo??)
>>> 
>>> To me this looks like a broken classpath on the user side. Without a
>>> patch to at least re-produce the issue I wouldn't spend too much time
>>> 
>>> on this.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Isabel

Reply via email to