Still though, it seems this code is too sensitive to the error margin.

Even when i change the input so that the case is not degenerate, i still
get  second norm of difference on Q of ~1e-5 between Cholesky and QR even
on 3 x 4 input which is large-ish imo,


On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:05 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]> wrote:

> oh, ok. So input is indeed still deficient. ok .
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> well the positive definite test is failing starting with row 2.  I
>> stepped thru it. But i am at loss why.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:55 PM, Andrew Musselman <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Just noticed it looks like some kind of rounding error since rows "2" and
>>> "3" in rControl have very small values in their elements.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 6:48 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > I am trying to put in Cholesky-based distributed thin QR and having
>>> > troubles again (even with in-core). What am i doing wrong? I am
>>> inclined to
>>> > think there's definitely a bug in our Cholesky implementation, at this
>>> > point.
>>> >
>>> > Here is the test code -- obviously results are different via
>>> Householder QR
>>> > and via Cholesky. Note that two rows of L' (R) matrix match the result
>>> > exactly, and it looks like L is just loosing two of its columns
>>> somehow.
>>> >
>>> > Could somebody perhaps review the CholeskyDecomposition in Mahout?
>>> Because
>>> > of this, tests in spark - QR and spark -SSVD are failing.
>>> >
>>> > here's the code for in-core only and output:
>>> >
>>> > -----------------
>>> >
>>> >     val inCoreA = dense(
>>> >       (1, 2, 3, 40),
>>> >       (2, 3, 4, 50),
>>> >       (3, 4, 5, 60),
>>> >       (4, 5, 6, 70),
>>> >       (5, 6, 7, 80)
>>> >     )
>>> >
>>> >     val (qControl, rControl) = qr(inCoreA)
>>> >
>>> >     printf("qControl=\n%s\n", qControl)
>>> >     printf("rControl=\n%s\n", rControl)
>>> >
>>> >     // Validate with Cholesky
>>> >     val ch = chol(inCoreA.t %*% inCoreA)
>>> >     val rControl2 = (ch.getL cloned).t
>>> >     val qControl2 = ch.solveRight(inCoreA)
>>> >
>>> >     printf("qControl2=\n%s\n", qControl2)
>>> >     printf("rControl2=\n%s\n", rControl2)
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > qControl=
>>> > {
>>> >   0  =>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> {0:0.13483997249264842,1:0.7627700713964736,2:0.09950371902099892,3:-0.30053573339989126}
>>> >   1  =>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> {0:0.26967994498529685,1:0.4767312946227957,2:0.19900743804199783,3:0.34749444174362476}
>>> >   2  =>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> {0:0.40451991747794525,1:0.1906925178491178,2:0.39801487608399566,3:0.22070592921554588}
>>> >   3  =>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> {0:0.5393598899705937,1:-0.09534625892456007,2:0.39801487608399566,3:0.6949888834872495}
>>> >   4  =>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> {0:0.6741998624632421,1:-0.3813850356982384,2:0.7960297521679913,3:-0.5071540501123155}
>>> > }
>>> > rControl=
>>> > {
>>> >   0  =>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> {0:7.416198487095663,1:9.43879807448539,2:11.461397661875116,3:134.83997249264843}
>>> >   1  => {1:0.9534625892455925,2:1.906925178491185,3:28.603877677367773}
>>> >   2  => {2:2.2315206618374916E-15,3:4.1360462167918654E-14}
>>> >   3  => {3:1.8726762404185252E-15}
>>> > }
>>> > L:
>>> > {
>>> >   0  => {0:7.416198487095663}
>>> >   1  => {0:9.43879807448539,1:0.953462589245576}
>>> >   2  => {0:11.461397661875116,1:1.9069251784911967}
>>> >   3  => {0:134.83997249264843,1:28.603877677367997}
>>> > }
>>> > qControl2=
>>> > {
>>> >   0  => {0:0.13483997249264842,1:0.7627700713964867}
>>> >   1  => {0:0.26967994498529685,1:0.4767312946228039}
>>> >   2  => {0:0.40451991747794525,1:0.19069251784912108}
>>> >   3  => {0:0.5393598899705937,1:-0.09534625892456171}
>>> >   4  => {0:0.674199862463242,1:-0.38138503569824406}
>>> > }
>>> > rControl2=
>>> > {
>>> >   0  =>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> {0:7.416198487095663,1:9.43879807448539,2:11.461397661875116,3:134.83997249264843}
>>> >   1  => {1:0.953462589245576,2:1.9069251784911967,3:28.603877677367997}
>>> >   2  => {}
>>> >   3  => {}
>>> > }
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to