On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Anand Avati <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Co incidentally I was wildly imagining/exploring integration with the > fortran blas behind the in-core DSL using jni. I had not come across these > BIDData projects. I'm happy to reorient that effort towards exploring > these. > Well, it's both. JBlas & JCublas. should be too expensive. if i had to choose, i'd say integrate jCublas first, seems to be a bit of an edge here. We already know from Sebastien's work with jblas that its integration for sparse methods is not that interesting. However, even vector-vector operations over views of gpu-stored data become somewhat interesting in context of dsl operators.
