i meant "shouldn't be too expensive." On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Anand Avati <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> Co incidentally I was wildly imagining/exploring integration with the >> fortran blas behind the in-core DSL using jni. I had not come across these >> BIDData projects. I'm happy to reorient that effort towards exploring >> these. >> > > Well, it's both. JBlas & JCublas. should be too expensive. > > if i had to choose, i'd say integrate jCublas first, seems to be a bit of > an edge here. We already know from Sebastien's work with jblas that its > integration for sparse methods is not that interesting. > > However, even vector-vector operations over views of gpu-stored data > become somewhat interesting in context of dsl operators. > >
