Yeah.. I'm not sure the lower case x Links are that visible maybe we need a better marker. the wip entry for NB should link to the m-1493 jira. Still no jira for flink bindings but I noticed some recent work the other day when looking at the mahout git hub network. So I just linked to Till Rohman's github branch. (Hope that's cool Till if you see this.. but we're very excited about flink bindings)
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]> </div><div>Date:10/24/2014 2:29 PM (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: [email protected] </div><div>Subject: Re: Mahout 1.0 features (revisited) </div><div> </div> Ah, you've already added links behind the X marks .. :) ok awesome. On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Dmitriy Lyubimov <[email protected]> wrote: > This is so awesome. > > i think i need to re(move) issues links from scala spark bindings page and > just point to this page. Perhaps it is good to add the links to the jiras, > at least for WIP entries > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Andrew Palumbo <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> aha.. yes.. Fixed it.. thx. and please do feel free to hack away at any >> content/organization that you see fit. I've tried to give a good >> description of Math-Scala/DSL all in one section. >> >> thx >> >> > Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:01:00 -0700 >> > Subject: Re: Mahout 1.0 features (revisited) >> > From: [email protected] >> > To: [email protected] >> > >> > awesome >> > >> > (typo in "Collaborative filtering" (have i spelled it right?) :) >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Andrew Palumbo <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > > ok, committed here: >> > > >> > > http://mahout.apache.org/users/basics/algorithms.html >> > > >> > > thx >> > > >> > > > From: [email protected] >> > > > To: [email protected] >> > > > Subject: RE: Mahout 1.0 features (revisited) >> > > > Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:49:15 -0400 >> > > > >> > > > Thank you guys for the feedback! I'll just commit the reorganized >> page >> > > in place of the current "List of Algorithms" page as is and the >> experts on >> > > each section can have at it / reorganize as they see fit. >> > > > >> > > > I know that this page is not a big deal but my goal is to clarify- >> not >> > > confuse- so I really appreciate the eyes! >> > > > >> > > > Another concern is that the page did not reflect the Hierarchical >> design >> > > of the new code.. ie. the Engine-bindings inheriting from and >> optimizing >> > > math-scala, which I think is a huge Mahout strong point. Maybe that >> is for >> > > another page... >> > > > >> > > > Thanks for the comments, Thejas... >> > > > > > > I guess another thing that could be added would be (needs >> > > > > > > development) so that developer can dig in and start working. >> > > > >> > > > this is a good idea but might clutter the page, Instead maybe we >> can >> > > make it known that anything (non- MR) without a marker "needs >> > > development". Then maybe an explanation/link from the "How to >> Contribute >> > > page" regarding this fact. >> > > > >> > > > > > > I think this is a very clear, and another thing we can add is >> maybe >> > > > > > > a link to the source code of the algorithm or an >> example/tutorial. >> > > > >> > > > I like this idea very much- maybe moving the doc links over to the >> algo >> > > column and then having the markers link to directly to the github >> source. >> > > The only problem i can think of here is that eg. "Item-Based >> Collaborative >> > > Filtering" has docs for both MapReduce and Spark, and in the future >> this >> > > may occur more often- though with the legacy status of MapReduce and >> the >> > > recent abstraction of CLI drivers, probably won't. >> > > > >> > > > It would be nice to have another dimension to work in. >> > > > >> > > > Thanks again, >> > > > >> > > > Andy >> > > > >> > > > From: [email protected] >> > > > To: [email protected] >> > > > Subject: RE: Mahout 1.0 features (revisited) >> > > > Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 11:46:34 -0400 >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Thank you guys for the feedback! I'll just commit the reorganized >> page >> > > in place of the current "List of Algorithms" page as is and the >> experts on >> > > each section can have at it / reorganize as they see fit. >> > > > >> > > > I know that this page is not a big deal but my goal is to clarify- >> not >> > > confuse- so I really appreciate the eyes! >> > > > >> > > > Another concern is that the page did not reflect the Hierarchical >> design >> > > of the new code.. ie. the Engine-bindings inheriting from and >> optimizing >> > > math-scala, which I think is a huge Mahout strong point. Maybe that >> is for >> > > another page... >> > > > >> > > > Thanks for the comments, Thejas... >> > > > > > > I guess another thing that could be added would be (needs >> > > > > > > development) so that developer can dig in and start >> working.this >> > > is a good idea but might clutter the page, Instead maybe we can make >> it >> > > known that anything (non- MR) without a marker "needs development". >> Then >> > > maybe an explanation/link from the "How to Contribute page" regarding >> this >> > > fact. >> > > > >> > > > > > > I think this is a very clear, and another thing we can add is >> maybe >> > > > > > > a link to the source code of the algorithm or an >> > > example/tutorial.I like this idea very much- maybe moving the doc >> links >> > > over to the algo column and then having the markers link to directly >> to the >> > > github source. The only problem i can think of here is that eg. >> > > "Item-Based Collaborative Filtering" has docs for both MapReduce and >> Spark, >> > > and in the future this may occur more often- though with the legacy >> status >> > > of MapReduce and the recent abstraction of CLI drivers, probably >> won't. >> > > > >> > > > It would be nice to have another dimension to work in. >> > > > >> > > > Thanks again, >> > > > >> > > > Andy >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:54:09 +0200 >> > > > > Subject: Re: Mahout 1.0 features (revisited) >> > > > > From: [email protected] >> > > > > To: [email protected] >> > > > > >> > > > > Great! >> > > > > >> > > > > On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Ted Dunning < >> [email protected]> >> > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 3:57 PM, Andrew Palumbo < >> [email protected]> >> > > > > > wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > > Or I can just commit as is and people can have at the >> organization. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Sounds good to me! >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> >> > >
