Hi Andy, That's really useful information for Mahout Dev/Users both.
Best, Mahesh.B. On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:57 PM, Andrew Palumbo <[email protected]> wrote: > I made a list of Mahout 1.0 features by engine a while back which I’ve > just reorganized (and added links to). I’m not sure whether It’s more > confusing this way or the original way: > > Original: > > https://andrewpalumbo.github.io/algorithms_by_engine > > One concern is that it doesn’t emphasize the new work done in math-scala > enough- given that there’s only one line of the table devoted to it. For > this reason, I’ve reorganized it a bit. > > Reorganized: > > https://andrewpalumbo.github.io/features_by_engine > > But this becomes confusing- eg. having 2 entries for SSVD- one in “Mahout > Math-Scala Core and Scala DSL” and one in “Collaborative Filtering with CLI > Drivers”. For this reason I’ve tried to break it down into > core-algorithms (math-scala, dsl, etc), and and end2end implementations of > those algorithms (and others) with a CLI. Here though too, I feel that > this is somewhat confusing: eg. does it seem that there is no SSVD > algorithm implemented for Spark or H2O? > > I’d like to commit this in place of the “List of algorithms page”: > > http://mahout.apache.org/users/basics/algorithms.html > > This new table is inclusive of all that is on the list for 0.9 (with the > exception of FPG). > > Briefly going over yesterday’s “Mahout vs Spark” thread: > http://mail-archives.us.apache.org/mod_mbox/mahout-user/201410.mbox/browser,I’d > like to put something out there to give users, developers and contributors > a quick overview of what Mahout 1.0 is/has/does/extends/keeps/can be used > for. However I don’t want it to cause any more confusion. > > There are probably some poorly described features, and maybe some > incorrect links, so once I’ve committed it, you guys may want to have at it. > > Or I can just commit as is and people can have at the organization. > > I’m in favor of the revised/reorganized page. I’d appreciate feedback > from any and all- specifically on whether the page is confusing and if so > how it might be better organized. > > Thanks, > > Andy > >
