[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14261488#comment-14261488
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on MAHOUT-1636:
----------------------------------------
Github user dlyubimov commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/mahout/pull/69#issuecomment-68398046
assembly should put all jars _separately_ in a predefined path such as
MAHOUT$HOME/lib.
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 12:31 PM, Pat Ferrel <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Hmm, not using shade and not doing any of the more funky things it
> supports. I guess you are talking about creating a trimmed down all-deps
> jar (using the assembly maven plugin)?
>
> Are you asking to exclude Mahout too? That would make the jar nothing more
> than lib-managed, right? It would be quite easy to do. The jar would still
> need to be a release artifact. And we would still have a huge list of jars
> to search in "mahout classpath -spark".
>
> I'm *not* a build engineer so if someone has a better way of doing this
> please speak up.
>
> —
> Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/apache/mahout/pull/69#issuecomment-68395014>.
>
> Class dependencies for the spark module are put in a job.jar, which is very
> inefficient
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MAHOUT-1636
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1636
> Project: Mahout
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: spark
> Affects Versions: 1.0-snapshot
> Reporter: Pat Ferrel
> Assignee: Ted Dunning
> Fix For: 1.0-snapshot
>
>
> using a maven plugin and an assembly job.xml a job.jar is created with all
> dependencies including transitive ones. This job.jar is in
> mahout/spark/target and is included in the classpath when a Spark job is run.
> This allows dependency classes to be found at runtime but the job.jar include
> a great deal of things not needed that are duplicates of classes found in the
> main mrlegacy job.jar. If the job.jar is removed, drivers will not find
> needed classes. A better way needs to be implemented for including class
> dependencies.
> I'm not sure what that better way is so am leaving the assembly alone for
> now. Whoever picks up this Jira will have to remove it after deciding on a
> better method.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)