Yeah I can see the upside to that def. But having tested the sources so thoroughly. Testing the binaries would be less work ..
It is nice to able to just `wget https://some miror/mahout-0.13.0.tar.gz` Let's revisit after we get the first java-only out the door. Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Trevor Grant <trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com> Date: 03/18/2017 1:28 PM (GMT-08:00) To: dev@mahout.apache.org Subject: Re: New RC? I'm yes and no about that. Yes- because, yea awesome. no- bc of limited testing bandwidth. I'd be more in favor of lets push 0.13.0 with minimal binary support, and then get IT testing all sured up (MAHOUT-1949) and then do another release soon, with very little additional code, but add native solvers and spark 2.0/scala 2.11 binaries e.g. lets just get the current one out the door and then focus on automation to make future release cycles quicker and less painful. just my .02 tg Trevor Grant Data Scientist https://github.com/rawkintrevo http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo http://trevorgrant.org *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things." -Virgil* On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com> wrote: > Ahh.. thats true.. they should be added in with profiles, so they're only > activated when the distribution is built specifically for them. > > > ReE: the distribution, I'd like to put three out.. one java only, one > java/OpenMP, and one Java/OpenMP/OpenCL. > > ________________________________ > From: Trevor Grant <trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com> > Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2017 3:59:48 PM > To: dev@mahout.apache.org > Subject: Re: New RC? > > I didn't realize we had intended to add viennaCl jars to binary > distibution... Cool if we do though. > > tg > > Trevor Grant > Data Scientist > https://github.com/rawkintrevo > http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo > http://trevorgrant.org > > *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things." -Virgil* > > > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com> > wrote: > > > I think we have a few minor changes that we could add (updating > readme.md > > eg..).. but more importantly when going through the poms this week, I > > noticed that the viennacl jars are not being added to the binary > > distribution artifact. > > > > Have not started a jira for it because I'm unsure of the fix, but I'll > > add one shortly.. def a blocker though.. until that is fixed No need for > an > > RC IMO. > > > > Andy > > > > > > > > Sent from my Galaxy Tab A > > > > > > -------- Original message -------- > > From: Trevor Grant <trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com> > > Date: 3/18/17 2:59 PM (GMT-05:00) > > To: dev@mahout.apache.org > > Subject: New RC? > > > > Are we cutting a new RC this weekend? > > > > tg > > > > Trevor Grant > > Data Scientist > > https://github.com/rawkintrevo > > http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo > > http://trevorgrant.org > > > > *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things." -Virgil* > > >
