Yeah please do, I just cut and pasted son instructions that I sent out the other day.. and didn't have much time..
Tge pasting in could be awkward.. I will go over them again too.. Thx alot Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> Date: 03/19/2017 3:04 PM (GMT-08:00) To: dev@mahout.apache.org Subject: Re: New RC? I can look later tonight after chores. On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 2:48 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com> wrote: > With the exception of the PR that I just opened > https://github.com/apache/mahout/pull/297 > > > <https://github.com/apache/mahout/pull/297> > > (please review, ^^) <https://github.com/apache/mahout/pull/297> the board > is back to clean.. > > > So we should be close to ready for a new RC After that's out. Could > everybody please take stock for a minute and be sure that everything > questionable to is good to go? > > > Could someone please double check > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=149&view=detail&selectedIssue=MAHOUT-1957 > and make sure that the pom in question is all set? > > > If all that's good I think that we're all set. > > ________________________________ > From: Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com> > Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2017 5:12:46 PM > To: dev@mahout.apache.org > Subject: Re: New RC? > > > +1 to a java only RC.. I bumped the issue that I'd created yesterday for > the binaries to 0.13.1, and moved the readme.md issue down from critical > to blocker. > > > Gonna work on that real quick right now. > > ________________________________ > From: Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> > Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2017 3:38:46 PM > To: dev@mahout.apache.org > Subject: Re: New RC? > > Makes sense to me, I can’t test the 2 GPU versions. If 0.13.0 that is > java only do we have an RC or code freeze to test? > > > On Mar 18, 2017, at 1:43 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com> wrote: > > Or rather if you're both in favor of it.. get the source/java only version > out as 0.13.0 and follow up with automated building g and testing framework > for 0.13.1. > > > > Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com> > Date: 03/18/2017 1:40 PM (GMT-08:00) > To: dev@mahout.apache.org > Subject: RE: New RC? > > Ok.. let's revisit after we get first out the door. > > > > > Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> > Date: 03/18/2017 1:34 PM (GMT-08:00) > To: dev@mahout.apache.org > Subject: Re: New RC? > > That's what I'd prefer too. > > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Trevor Grant <trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I'm yes and no about that. > > > > Yes- because, yea awesome. > > > > no- bc of limited testing bandwidth. > > > > I'd be more in favor of lets push 0.13.0 with minimal binary support, and > > then get IT testing all sured up (MAHOUT-1949) and then do another > release > > soon, with very little additional code, but add native solvers and spark > > 2.0/scala 2.11 binaries > > > > e.g. lets just get the current one out the door and then focus on > > automation to make future release cycles quicker and less painful. > > > > just my .02 > > > > tg > > > > Trevor Grant > > Data Scientist > > https://github.com/rawkintrevo > > http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo > > http://trevorgrant.org > > > > *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things." -Virgil* > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Ahh.. thats true.. they should be added in with profiles, so they're > only > >> activated when the distribution is built specifically for them. > >> > >> > >> ReE: the distribution, I'd like to put three out.. one java only, one > >> java/OpenMP, and one Java/OpenMP/OpenCL. > >> > >> ________________________________ > >> From: Trevor Grant <trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com> > >> Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2017 3:59:48 PM > >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: New RC? > >> > >> I didn't realize we had intended to add viennaCl jars to binary > >> distibution... Cool if we do though. > >> > >> tg > >> > >> Trevor Grant > >> Data Scientist > >> https://github.com/rawkintrevo > >> http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo > >> http://trevorgrant.org > >> > >> *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things." -Virgil* > >> > >> > >> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> I think we have a few minor changes that we could add (updating > >> readme.md > >>> eg..).. but more importantly when going through the poms this week, I > >>> noticed that the viennacl jars are not being added to the binary > >>> distribution artifact. > >>> > >>> Have not started a jira for it because I'm unsure of the fix, but > > I'll > >>> add one shortly.. def a blocker though.. until that is fixed No need > > for > >> an > >>> RC IMO. > >>> > >>> Andy > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Sent from my Galaxy Tab A > >>> > >>> > >>> -------- Original message -------- > >>> From: Trevor Grant <trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com> > >>> Date: 3/18/17 2:59 PM (GMT-05:00) > >>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org > >>> Subject: New RC? > >>> > >>> Are we cutting a new RC this weekend? > >>> > >>> tg > >>> > >>> Trevor Grant > >>> Data Scientist > >>> https://github.com/rawkintrevo > >>> http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo > >>> http://trevorgrant.org > >>> > >>> *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things." -Virgil* > >>> > >> > > > >
