> I have to confess. I have wondered at length (without reading too many > FAQs) why anyone would choose a name so closely associated with another > software project.
What's that other software project? Do you have a link? > IMO (however humble or not it may be) Sun should have kept StarOffice as > the OSS project, and created SunOffice. I think "OpenOffice" would be an alright name. I don't quite understand why we can't use it. Who owns it? I haven't figured that out yet. > But alas, my opinion was not sought, and that is water under the bridge. > Although I accept the necessity of including the .org on a legal basis, > I truly loathe having to include it in my writing and speech. I nearly > always have to explain the .org part, which should not be necessary. I don't say it in speech. It's just too cumbersome. I have speech problems as it is, and those two syllables make a real difference for me. Cheers, -- Daniel Carrera | I don't want it perfect, Join OOoAuthors today! | I want it Tuesday. http://oooauthors.org | --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
