Justin Clift <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hallo,
> I meant it more like "our end users and the end users for Firefox may > not be the same people". I'm not saying that they are, or they > aren't, I'm just saying that we might need to think about it more > before deciding that the people we're trying to really reach are the > same one's that are _already_ familiar with SpreadFireFox. I was talking to our Czech Firefox promotion team and we thinks, that the users bases of both programs are quite different. Firefox is more attractive for them. > Hope that's clearer. :) I've got it finally ;-) > I suppose it depends if each language is trying to develop it's own > Community, or is trying to translate a (probably growing?) central set > of documents "from outside"? From my point of view - it's about growing community. The main problem I see is this - local communities exists, they have local sites, forums, ... and when you'll create another one, you'll divide them in more groups and this is not good. We are small country, we have 10.000.000 people and we have two sites for the end users. We have forums, mailing lists are part of the 'cs' project, ... > a bit, they seem like the kinds of modules that probably would already > have their interfaces translated, and wouldn't need much admin work > nor tranlation compared to other things? I don't see a problem of interface translation. I see a big problem in content translation. Hmm, it looks like that the better solution is to have independent sites for all languages. Cheers, Robert -- Robert Vojta http://blog.vojta.name/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
