On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 13:35 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:33:55PM +0300, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > > >wants to fork it. All this "non-free" shit is riduculus, and is one > > >of the reasons Linux will never replace Windows. > > > > The only reason why I want Linux to replace windows is because is FREE. > > I really > > wouldn't give a crap about it if Linux (and it's software) was non-free. > > This is a very important point. If Linux weren't FREE it wouldn't even > be what it is. The "free" part is the most important piece.
You're distorting the point. It's silly and irrelevant to separate them. It's Free and free and is where it is because together those things are powerful. > > ak > > > > > -- > > Alexandro Colorado > > Co-Leader of OpenOffice.org Spanish > > http://es.openoffice.org/ > > > > > > > >-Chad Smith > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.hiser-adelstein.com (212) 372-3361 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
