Chad Smith wrote:
On 10/21/05, Charles-H.Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Your discussion, although interesting from a theoretical point of view,
is hence more suited to lists such as [email protected] .
What's more, your constant chatter is hindering the work of the
Marketing Project.
I completely disagree. From the mailing lists
page<http://www.openoffice.org/mail_list.html>
:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This list is intended for discussions on OpenOffice.org and Open Source.
I believe that any discussion about the OpenDocument Format (since it is a
part - some have claimed, the most important part - about OOo / and since it
is obviously related to the Open Source movement) absolutely belongs on the
Discuss list.
Clearly Open Source and Open Standards find much appeal in the other,
but Open Standards are not so
directly linked to Open Source. Standards bodies and their noble
efforts existed long before FOSS.
Let's not confuse the 'Open' part: M$ has every bit the same
opportunity to follow 'Open' Standards
w/o changing their license scheme.
Anyway, we are not talking about Marketing anymore and should move the
discussion to a more appropriate spot.
If the topic/thread has morphed to something other than promoting a
petition (the subject line), okay. Otherwise,
from that, it would seem to be in the social category.
Eric
-Chad Smith
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
