On 11/30/05, Ian Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone who has been on these lists any length of time should know the > main improvements.
I agree, they *should*. But since all the traffic is about the ODF, (and I'm not just talking about the discussions with me about it, either), I didn't know all 5 improvements other than the ODF. That's kind of my point. They aren't talked about. There needs to be a conise summary. Things like press releases that Louis did, they need to spend more time on *ALL* the improvements, and not take up 2/3 of the release talking about the glories of ODF. If a newbie had posted "what is the difference between 1.1.5 and 2.0", > fair enough. Indeed if an experienced person said what we need is a > succinct list of the improvements, fair enough. The answer would be > found in some detail at > > http://marketing.openoffice.org/2.0/featureguide.html > > If it is thought that there needs to be a concise summary, that is a > different issue and should be written as a call for volunteers to > produce it. > Sorry I didn't follow your perceived protocol, Ian. I thought posting to a thread on the Marketing List of OpenOffice.org (remember, OOo, not ODF, there are other lists for that), would have been good enough. Maybe I should have submitted an RFE to IssueZilla. -- - Chad Smith http://www.gimpshop.net/ Because everyone loves free software!
