Louis Suarez-Potts wrote:
As it stands, I guess no, but the wiki proved that if enough of the
community makes enough noise and makes a good enough case then even
Collabnet will respond eventually.
Let's find the best solution and then look at where to run it.
Uhm. I think we have to be a little more precise here.... CollabNet is
paid by Sun to do hosting for OOo. The limits of CollabNet's work are
to a great degree drawn by Sun's investment. So, not sure what John is
referring to here....
I'm not even sure that the wiki is provided by CollabNet. It's under the
'services' domain. I did a whois but it wasn't in the database. Maybe
someone can tell us who provides this wiki.
In any event, this just means that the community only has minimal
control of the website. We can't, for example, decide to use PHP, or an
SQL backend, or upgrade the lists to Mailman, or use a CMS, or stop
using CVS for maintaining the website. These are decisions that the
community should be able to make but can't.
Cheers,
Daniel.
--
/\/`) http://oooauthors.org
/\/_/ http://opendocumentfellowship.org
/\/_/
\/_/ I am not over-weight, I am under-tall.
/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
