On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 08:27 -0800, Manos Batsis wrote: > > This gets my vote as well, the option to disable is by far the most > sensible choice.
Oddly enough I suggested that about 24 hours ago ;-) From a marketing point of view best solution is to remove them but failing that disable them. > I may be a lurker here, but i also promote an market > OOo and other in my day job besides developing closed or open source > (not OOo). > Saying that developers don't know squat on marketing may be right[1], > but marketeers do not have a clue about the developer culture, which is > equally important. I have done development - OK quite a while ago. I agree cultures are different so let's use the relevant expertise to make a winning combination. This developer/community divide issue was largely a figment of Charles' vivid imagination. What I called for was some taking into account of people's qualifactions and expertise. I doubt any reasonably minded developer would argue with that. Polarising that into a war over who has or has not got ultimate control is pretty silly. Sun has ultimate control, even if it chooses not to exercise that control. That's the way it is. He who pays the piper calls the tune. Regards, -- Ian Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ZMS Ltd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
