On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Jonathon Blake wrote: > Charles wrote: > > > release a build without them and submit it in the CVS. That's the way it > > The best idea would be to fork OOo, to create an office suite that > focuses exclusively on teh corporate/educational market. [These two > markets have far more in common, than either have with the individual > user.]
Having a fork seems a bit excessive. The often-suggested "administrator decides whether Easter Eggs get installed or not" would require additional code, but nowhere near the trouble of maintaining two separate versions which are 99.44% identical -- a very expensive proposition indeed. > xan > > jonathon > -- J. David Eisenberg http://catcode.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
