Lars,
I think you are right that this is an important issue.

On the other hand, it is such a huge battle and really makes us fight against 
the current. Using mental judo, perhaps we have another alternative:

A brand name that is used too generically by too many people risks losing its 
legal trademark status. (Xerox, Kleenex and Band-Aid have fought hard against 
this.) "Powerpoint" must be close to this danger. What if we start deliberately 
mis-using Microsoft's trademark and push hard to make powerpoint become a truly 
generic term? What if we say that Impress is a "powerpoint program." We're just 
talking the way that millions of people already do, but with a slightly more 
subversive intent...

What might the result be? Break their hold on the trademark (cost them a lot of 
money trying to defend it) and also communicate in a way that people will 
understand more easily. I think this path holds promise.

Thanks,
Ben
 
On Friday, March 10, 2006, at 10:30AM, Lars D. Noodén <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Many people confuse the general category "presentation graphics" with a 
>specific brand and product line of software.
>
>It is a problem for us that too many people use one particular brand name 
>instead of the general term "presentation graphics".  For many of these 
>people, the brand name *is* presentation graphics and for them there is 
>only one.  Others know better, but contribute to the problem by not using 
>the correct term.
>
>Newpapers make that mistake and I see even major magazines like Time and 
>Newsweek make that mistake.
>
>It's a matter of marketing.  If we can start insisting on editors saying 
>"presentation graphics" when they mean presentation graphics, and not say 
>"MS PowerPoint (r)" when they mean "presentation graphics", we open the 
>opportunity to bring in OOo and Impress.  If we leave it be, we leave the 
>market with one single product whether we want to or not.
>
>Mindshare is important
>
>Comments, thoughts, suggestions?
>
>-Lars
>Lars Nooden ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>       Keep the market open by keeping software patents out:
>       
> http://europa.eu.int/comm/internal_market/indprop/patent/consultation_en.htm
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to