Alexandro, On Tuesday May 02 2006 08:53, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > >> Ok so the next step is how do we comunicate. I think puting an open > >> letter explaining the reason why we don't have these might at least > >> prove a stance on the issue. Not doing it will just be failing to > >> communicate. I think the best option is to start working on mockups on > >> how this open letter should be assemble and use the wiki to work on > >> the draft. > > > > are you realy sure this is all true?? > > I am sure that the marketing list should put a statement on this topic as > opposed to be wondering reasons why rather sit down and not do anything > (like it always do).
I would agree some type of statement or "standard" answer should be prepared to help OOo volunteers address this issue when it comes up. However, I believe that others on this list are only pointing out that any statements in such an instrument should be verified as accurate. Like some others, I'm not sure what the roadmap is for future versions. I would also suggest that in addition to providing some info on alternatives, it should include some information on how someone (who is not a developer/programmer) could contribute to such a PIM if they felt strongly enough about it. -- Jeffrey G. Causey, CPA, CAPM President Strategic Innovations, Inc. 336-675-1652 www.strategic-innovations-inc.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
