Hi Andrew, Andrew Ziem wrote (28-3-2008 0:28)
I did a lot of editing of the Features 2.4 wiki page that (to my surprise) became the release notes <http://development.openoffice.org/releases/2.4.0.html>. As I could find relevant information, I included links to other sites: GullFOSS and (my site) OOoNinja.com. All the links to latter disappeared, but the text (like "Article") remains.
My first reaction was of some concern, because I vaguely remember that I've removed links from the info. Was in an extremely busy time, when sometimes I do stupid things. Further looking/thinking made clear to me that I only removed links to the OOo tech-announcements and double issues (documentation related). Pffew..
And I see, that you do not mean the wiki itself (1), but the main OOo-site.
Are these links not acceptable, or is this a mistake? I hope I am providing content valuable to users and welcomed by the community**. If not, let me know directly. If this omission was deliberate you may have missed the veoh.com video link which I made.
I consider your blogs/site as valuable information. But OTOH, it is a kind of linking to one's personal site, maybe that's the reason why some others have their doubts for the links on the main OOo-site? Can be worthy discussion. Anyway better than just removing without notification, I think. To get to know that all, I guess we've to ask at [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc-ed by now.
Kindest regards, Cor 1) http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/New_Features_2.4 -- "The Year of 3" -2008- "Het jaar van 3" Cor Nouws Arnhem - Netherlands - nl.OpenOffice.org - marketing contact --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
