I just want to ask, what is behind all of this lately, it seems like we are going to have to start defending OO.o. I have been around the project since before version 1 and aside from someone having a copyright on OpenOffice for office furniture or something, have not seen us have to defend it like this before.
James On Sun, Mar 8, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Alexandro Colorado <[email protected]>wrote: > On Sun, 08 Mar 2009 21:28:52 -0600, Jonathon Coombes <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> What about non-digital ones. >>> >> I can't paste those! >> I am not sure what you mean by non-digital publications? Are you talking >> about white-papers or some form of research paper? Some of the above are >> also printed papers/magazines, does that count as non-digital? >> > > Well I mean like public documentation you can point like the bibliography. > For example: > Australian Tech Daily > Issue #25 Year 2005 > Article: "OpenOffice.org is here to stay" > > -- > Alexandro Colorado > CoLeader of OpenOffice.org ES > http://es.openoffice.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
