Hi Sergio, On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 5:59 PM, Sergio Fernández < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Nandana, > > > On 03/02/14 17:44, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya wrote: > >> During today's call there was a discussion about potential LDP >> implementations and the Maramotta came up too. The spec is supposed to be >> stable in one or two weeks and it needs at least 3 implementations for >> each >> feature on it's way to a recommendation. I know this is on Sergio's >> backlog >> but I though this might also be a good idea for a GSoC project bootstrap >> LDP support in Marmotta with the guidance from Sergio. I can also provide >> guidance from the spec point of view. WDYT ? >> > > Now everything comes at the same time ;-) > > I've been following the discussions through the mailing list, but in the > last months it has been very hard for me to actively participate in the WG; > apologize for that. But this month we have started to work at Salzburg > Research in a new EU project (Fusepool P3, http://www.fusepool.eu) where > we have the resources to finally implement LDP in Marmotta now that the > specification is stable. > > Jakob and myself have been discussed it, and we're planning to do a > development sprint the whole following week, where I hope we can get the > core parts implemented. Contributions from other to this sprint would be > welcomed, we'll coordinate it through Jira. > That is great news. I would definitely be happy to contribute in this space. Therefore I'm not sure how to focus this with respect to GSoC... Maybe we > can try to outline some of the tasks around, and while we focus on the > core, propose some of them to the GSoC. For instance, some things that I > can think: > > * LDP Clients: Java, PHP, Python, Javascript, etc... > * LDP Test Suite in Java > Yes, that makes sense. A set of LDP clients would be a good addition. Best Regards, Nandana
