Something to discuss, since we planned to resume our LDP tasks by the beginning of September. Can we afford to target ldp:IndirectContainer too?

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: LDP agenda for 25 August 2014 - please read!
Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 19:01:33 +0000
Resent-From: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:00:54 -0700
From: Arnaud Le Hors <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]

Hi all,

The agenda for Monday's call is now available:
https://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2014.08.25

Beware that given the current lack of implementation of IndirectContainer
I'm proposing that we move IndirectContainer to a separate document so
that the main spec can progress to PR without behind held back by the
current lack of support for IndirectContainer.

PROPOSAL: Move IndirectContainer to a separate spec to allow LDP 1.0 to
move forward

Regards.
--
Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Standards - IBM
Software Group


--
Sergio Fernández
Senior Researcher
Knowledge and Media Technologies
Salzburg Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH
Jakob-Haringer-Straße 5/3 | 5020 Salzburg, Austria
T: +43 662 2288 318 | M: +43 660 2747 925
[email protected]
http://www.salzburgresearch.at


Reply via email to