Hi all, in the last days I resumed with the LDP implementation, trying to fix the failing tests in the official test suite.
Right now, it is hard to estimate the effort to implement direct or indirect containers, and I'm not sure how soon I'll have time to look closer into it. But for me it's OK to move them into a separate document, so no hurry here from my side. Best, Jakob Am 25.08.2014 09:40 schrieb "Sergio Fernández" < [email protected]>: > Something to discuss, since we planned to resume our LDP tasks by the > beginning of September. Can we afford to target ldp:IndirectContainer too? > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: LDP agenda for 25 August 2014 - please read! > Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 19:01:33 +0000 > Resent-From: [email protected] > Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 12:00:54 -0700 > From: Arnaud Le Hors <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > > Hi all, > > The agenda for Monday's call is now available: > https://www.w3.org/2012/ldp/wiki/Meetings:Telecon2014.08.25 > > Beware that given the current lack of implementation of IndirectContainer > I'm proposing that we move IndirectContainer to a separate document so > that the main spec can progress to PR without behind held back by the > current lack of support for IndirectContainer. > > PROPOSAL: Move IndirectContainer to a separate spec to allow LDP 1.0 to > move forward > > Regards. > -- > Arnaud Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Standards - IBM > Software Group > > > -- > Sergio Fernández > Senior Researcher > Knowledge and Media Technologies > Salzburg Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH > Jakob-Haringer-Straße 5/3 | 5020 Salzburg, Austria > T: +43 662 2288 318 | M: +43 660 2747 925 > [email protected] > http://www.salzburgresearch.at > > >
