Hi,
On 26/03/13 12:33, Andy Seaborne wrote:
On 25/03/13 16:50, Sergio Fernández wrote:
On 25/03/13 17:02, Andy Seaborne wrote:
The license for json.org has the linethat makes it in contradiction
with the definition of open source:
This is no longer an issue, since we managed to rewrite some code and
completely removed such dependency (commit
bdb25fedcbb38c311ffb4f08e84505163109718d) with other with better
licensing and performance.
I would point out that by shipping any system, you take on the
responsibilities from the license of that system system, not the part
you happen to use.
Sure. In this case the system is Jackson, which was already in use in
Marmotta: I've just replaced the single usage of json.org by the
equivalent in Jackson.
Thanks for the remark; we really appreciate your toil as mentors :-)
Cheers,
--
Sergio Fernández
