Hi Andy, thanks for pointing this out. Comments inline below:
2013/3/28 Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> > Let's take a look at two examples; I think they need to handled > differently. > > == D3.js > > This is minimized and has no license statement. > > We don't want to imply it's Apache contributed code > > I believe this needs a entry in NOTICE. > > (an alternative might be to put a LICENSE/NOTCIE file in that directory - > not sure about that) > Neither am I. I am already sufficiently confused with legal issues :) > > == Sgvizler.pack.js > > This has a copyright license in the file so this is is definitely under the > > http://www.apache.org/dev/**licensing-howto.html#mod-**notice<http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice> > "it suffices to leave those notices in their original locations." > > On the one hand, yes. On the other hand, the NOTICE needs to contain pointers to the source code locations of 3rd party works: http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html#labeling (see Source Access). The Source Access is the main reason why these entries are in the NOTICE file. Sebastian
