On 18/04/13 09:28, Sebastian Schaffert wrote:
Hi Andy,
maybe not a typo but definately a confusion, sorry. Still not a legal
expert, and this is all a bit confusing. :-( Marvin's mail helped a lot. I
will send a reply tomorrow (meetings until 22:00 today...).
Apache is always on the basis of "if you have time" ... both :-) and :-(
In any case, I'd suggest that we either:
- cancel the vote and try to fix the NOTICE
- proceed with the release and fix the NOTICE in 3.0.1
What is your feeling?
IMO Leave the vote open and see what further reaction there is. Marvin
may do more review judging by his email. It's a lot of time to do a
review and 3 days for something this big is not long and they are coming
to it without background.
The issues coming up are similar to what we have discussed here, but
with a more experienced perspective. The Roy elaboration was new to me
(too much "web", where pointer = URL).
Andy
Sebastian
2013/4/18 Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org>
On 17/04/13 19:00, Sebastian Schaffert wrote:
The 3rd party Javascript files we include are "submitted to the ASF", but
they are often under MIT license and therefore category A in [2].
Sebastian - was that a typo?
Using material from elsewhere is not "submitted to the ASF".
"submission" is act of giving (grant, placed on JIRA, sent to an ASF email
list)
The link at the place you quote goes to:
"""
0. This section refers only to works submitted directly to the ASF by the
copyright owner or owner's agent.
"""
Andy
