Hi Andy, Thanks for the clarification :-) I am currently in the train to a conference, hopefully I can do take care of this in the afternoon once I am there.
Greetings Sebastian Am 22.04.2013 11:14 schrieb "Andy Seaborne" <a...@apache.org>: > On 21/04/13 17:51, Sergio Fernández wrote: > >> So... not, what should be do? >> >> We got some discussion, right, but no enough for getting votes from any >> other IPMC member not directly involved in Marmotta (i.e., not a mentor). >> >> Should we try to re-focues the discussion? I mean, there are few things >> could be improved, as always; so, identify those concrete details, find >> the way to solve it, and, in case those things are not blocking the >> release, be executive on getting Marmotta released during 2013. I fear >> this process is taking too long... >> > > Looking over the email on geneal@incubator, the last message in the > general conversation was Marven Humphrey's. He's provided quite a lot of > commentary. There is a JIRA item (206) about the format of the ASF > copyright statement. > > I don't see a reply on the general list or here on dev@ to know what the > project thinks about this. I guess the project needs to come to a position > on this maybe via a discussion on dev@. > > If anythign is unclear, the project, ideally the release manager (so it's > a single conversation) can also ask for any further clarification from sebb > and/or Marvin. > > Andy > > >> On 18/04/13 14:49, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Andy Seaborne<a...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> In any case, I'd suggest that we either: >>>> >>>>> - cancel the vote and try to fix the NOTICE >>>>> - proceed with the release and fix the NOTICE in 3.0.1 >>>>> >>>>> What is your feeling? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> IMO Leave the vote open and see what further reaction there is. Marvin >>>> may do more review judging by his email. It's a lot of time to do a >>>> review >>>> and 3 days for something this big is not long and they are coming to it >>>> without background. >>>> >>>> >>> +1. I also think it would be good to keep the vote open for some more >>> time. >>> As Andy said, I think one traction is the fact that having four >>> relatively >>> big distributions and reviewing needs a considerable time and effort. On >>> the other hand, it is apparent from the thread that people are having a >>> look at the NOTICE and LICENCE files and providing feedback which is very >>> good as that is clearly the tricky part of the release. While the the >>> current discussion on the general@a.o gets attention, it might be quite >>> possible that more people will check that. >>> >>> So I also recommend to keep the vote open and keep the discussion on the >>> parallel thread going to reach some consensus and only if necessary >>> re-spin >>> the release to fix the NOTICE. >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Nandana >>> >>> >> >
