On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote:

> On 27/05/13 15:27, Sergio Fernández wrote:
>
>> FMPOV is too early to think about such option. We still need to
>> demonstrate some things: stablish releases cycles, being able to publish
>> maintenance releases, grow the community, etc.
>>
>> Do you think we could be ready? Personally I'm not sure.
>>
>
> All good points, especially the transition from the original single-site
> team to the wider community of developers.
>
> Communities continue to grow and evolve after graduation.


In my understanding having active contributor in at least 3 geographically
and organisational distinct places is a prerequisite for graduation.

When I look at the commits from the last months they all seem to originate
from people associated to Salzburg Research. I think it is important that
apache projects are not de-facto run by a single institution. I think the
diversity requirement also fosters integration and collaboration with other
apache projects.

Cheers,
Reto


>
> The test question whether being in incubation helps in any way with those
> things or whether its merely which side of some arbitrary line the project
> is while progressing those issues.
>
> Just after graduation is an interesting time for any project.
>
> So concretely - what more can incubation give you?
>
>         Andy
>
>
>
>>
>> On 27/05/13 15:30, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>
>>> The report for April said the top three items to address in the move
>>> towards graduation were:
>>>
>>>    1. Ingest code and clear IP.
>>>    2. A release
>>>    3. Build dev and PMC.
>>>
>>> Tick; tick; and we've added to the PPMC.
>>>
>>> So - more to do? or is next time to graduate?
>>>
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/**guides/graduation.html<http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html>
>>>
>>>      Andy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to