On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 27/05/13 15:27, Sergio Fernández wrote: > >> FMPOV is too early to think about such option. We still need to >> demonstrate some things: stablish releases cycles, being able to publish >> maintenance releases, grow the community, etc. >> >> Do you think we could be ready? Personally I'm not sure. >> > > All good points, especially the transition from the original single-site > team to the wider community of developers. > > Communities continue to grow and evolve after graduation. In my understanding having active contributor in at least 3 geographically and organisational distinct places is a prerequisite for graduation. When I look at the commits from the last months they all seem to originate from people associated to Salzburg Research. I think it is important that apache projects are not de-facto run by a single institution. I think the diversity requirement also fosters integration and collaboration with other apache projects. Cheers, Reto > > The test question whether being in incubation helps in any way with those > things or whether its merely which side of some arbitrary line the project > is while progressing those issues. > > Just after graduation is an interesting time for any project. > > So concretely - what more can incubation give you? > > Andy > > > >> >> On 27/05/13 15:30, Andy Seaborne wrote: >> >>> The report for April said the top three items to address in the move >>> towards graduation were: >>> >>> 1. Ingest code and clear IP. >>> 2. A release >>> 3. Build dev and PMC. >>> >>> Tick; tick; and we've added to the PPMC. >>> >>> So - more to do? or is next time to graduate? >>> >>> http://incubator.apache.org/**guides/graduation.html<http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html> >>> >>> Andy >>> >>> >>> >> >