On 03/06/13 16:25, Reto Bachmann-Gmür wrote:
In my understanding having active contributor in at least 3
geographically and organisational distinct places is a prerequisite
for graduation.
Not to my knowledge - reference? It's *a* rule-of-thumb for judging the
robust-ness to change of a (P)PMC but not policy or even universally agreed.
Every TLP has some odd wrinkle or other - they are not hard to find (as
Marmotta found for L&N ... as many podlings find when looking at L&N
examples!).
On 03/06/13 18:37, Sebastian Schaffert wrote:
I agree that we should not hurry unnecessarily and first grow a
broader community and accept more members that were not part of the
original founders.
No problem, but being in or out of incubator is not particularly
relevant. There are some small advantages after graduation as naming is
more stable (current incubator process makes this less of an issue
nowadays), the removal of the disclaimer helps (a little). It also
dissociates from the initial list of people. All these are quite
marginal though from my experience in ASF. YMMV.
Andy
