+1 for raising this issue. I'm happy with both, "context" and "graph" (with a slight preference for "context" as this is the term used in the Sesame API)
namedGraph, quad, kspace, etc... I don't like... Best Jakob On 4 June 2013 18:33, Sergio Fernández <wik...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > in Marmotta we inherited from the underlined RDF API (Sesame OpenRDF) the > term "context" for referring to triple containers with their own URI. > > There are several other terms for referring same thing: graph, named graph, > quad, etc; actually in the former KiWi were known as "knowledge spaces". > Moreover we have a terminology issue with the statement @context in LDPath. > > So, since we are still in the moment where such core concepts could be > renamed, do you thing we should do it? > > Personally I'd be happy to switch to graph, but I'm also fine with the > current term. > > Thanks in advance for your comments. > > Cheers, > > -- > Sergio Fernández
