Jason van Zyl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 18/08/2003 03:40:14 PM: > On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 01:12, Brett Porter wrote: > > Is there any consensus about merging the branch in this way? > > > > How are the developers currently building HEAD so that we can check changes > > are compiling in ok? I imagine a certain subset of plugins are working? > > Tomorrow Dion is going to move the stable back to HEAD. We made an error > in judgement. Then I will merge stuff back in as I have it. > > So a bit of a summary: > > - I am going to focus on the memory leak i.e. merge the fixes I have > into what will be HEAD. > > - Dion is going to touch up the plugin download/install goodies. This > will let us separate the plugins from the core. FWIW, this works as per the test case in CVS. If there are other cases people would like included, please let me know.
> - We'll create components in JIRA for each of the plugins (ben has done > this mostly) and then move plugin issues listed for 1.0 to their > respective component in JIRA. This will definitely help boatloads. > > - We'll revamp the list of issues for 1.0 try to knock them off and then > release. -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
