Right so you are rolling back the core changes, but not the plugin changes on HEAD? I'm not sure how you are going to execute it - sounds like a pain in the butt.
I thought the branch was pretty much up to date with relevant changes on HEAD and going along happily... So occasionally merging stuff and repairing HEAD should work out ok. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, 18 August 2003 4:48 PM > To: Maven Developers List > Subject: RE: branch merge strategy WAS: some cvs commit thread :) > > > Don't worry read the docs. > > We don't strictly want to do a -j, as some things changed in > HEAD and need > to be reverted. > -- > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting > Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 18/08/2003 04:40:56 PM: > > > What's -j do??? > > -- > > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting > > Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ > > > > > > Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 18/08/2003 > 04:31:26 > > PM: > > > > > Cool, so just doing a cvs update -j MAVEN_RC1_STABLE on HEAD? > > Essentially > > > what we'd been talking about, but doing it as a once only and > > > closing > > off > > > the branch, right? > > > > > > - Brett > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Monday, 18 August 2003 4:18 PM > > > > To: Maven Developers List > > > > Subject: RE: branch merge strategy WAS: some cvs commit > thread :) > > > > > > > > > > > > Nope, > > > > > > > > it's a merge of recent changes with Stable, except the core > > > > changes which > > > > will be reapplied later. > > > > -- > > > > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting > > > > Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ > > > > > > > > > > > > Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 18/08/2003 > > > > 04:09:10 PM: > > > > > > > > > > Tomorrow Dion is going to move the stable back to HEAD. We > > > > > > made an error in judgement. Then I will merge stuff > back in as > > > > > > I have it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sounds like a good plan, but could you clarify "move > stable back > to > > > > HEAD"? > > > > > How exactly will that be done? Is this rolling back what is in > HEAD > > > > > now? > > > > > > > > > > Sorry for any slow responses, seems like it is taking > 20 minutes > to > > > > > get > > > > mail > > > > > through at the moment :( > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Brett > > > > >
