"Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 15/09/2003 05:39:57 PM:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > >Are we all in agreement that the next release should happen pretty soon, > >and be called 1.0-beta-11? > > >I'm +0 on that name vs 1.0-RC1, as we know we aren't adding new > >functionality. > > >Any objections/vote now? > > >Here's my +1. > > Please, please, please, please, please, please, please apply the patch > in MAVEN-690 before tagging a new release. I'll see if I can get it in. > The only thing that's missing for this is in MAVEN-690, I even sent a > patch with descriptions that only needs to be applied. > > All that it got was to be buried in a bug tracking system and not to > be looked at again. And got scheduled for "1.1" which is > ridiculous. If the maven developers thinks so, they can as well rip > out the torque-plugin because it's non-functional in its current > state. It got scheduled for 1.1, as only core bugs were scheduled for 1.0 unless one of the developers cared to fix plugins. The plugins are on a separate lifecycle to maven now, and can be fixed and released without maven needing to be released. > So I'm (non-binding vote) -1 for a release without MAVEN-690 applied > and +1 for a release with it applied. > > Please. I'll buy you a beer on ApacheCon. I wish I was gonna be there. I'm leaving the states on the 4th of November this year :-( -- dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
