On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 20:20, Brett Porter wrote: > Are they doing 1.1 only plugins? If the decision to break compatibility with > 1.0 is made, then they do the same thing - dev their new versions on > maven-plugins/plugin-name HEAD, and branch the old one only for 1.0 > compatible bugfixes. > > I think that would be a crazy decision to make on behalf of the plugin > owner, as there'll be no public releases of 1.1 for a long time yet. I don't > see any need for people to break 1.0 compatibility inside a plugin right > now. If they need POM v4 features, there are conditionals to do it. > > Branching the entire maven-plugins tree is a statement that the plugin > development is again tied to Maven, which just isn't the case.
Exactly. We don't need to branch the plugins. > Cheers, > Brett > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, 25 November 2003 12:21 PM > > To: Maven Developers List > > Subject: RE: 1.0, 1.1 and branches - Status? > > > > > > I still don't see how people are going to do 1.1 plugins > > without applying > > the same branches to maven-plugins. > > > > Shouldn't both modules have the same set of branches created? > > -- > > dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting > > Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/ > > > > > > -- jvz. Jason van Zyl [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://tambora.zenplex.org In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it. -- Jacques Ellul, The Technological Society --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
